On John Edwards ‘Love Child’

by matttbastard

“Double standard!” cries Slate media critic Jack Shafer.  “An elaborate cover up!” whines hacktacular OG ‘even the liberal’ blogger Mickey Kaus.  ‘Liberal bias!’ wails the wingnutosphere (surprise, surprise).

All that self-righteous sturm und drang simply because the MSM hasn’t dove on recent reports from that bastion of responsible journalism, The National Enquirer, alleging that former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards cheated on his wife, Elizabeth, with a woman named Reille Hunter.

Oooh.  Shocking.  A liberal Democrat with no moral values–way to conform to years of movement conservative propaganda, John Boy.

Sorry, kiddies; as John Cole aptly notes, the Grand Old Party has upped the ante on sex scandals to the point where a mere (yes, heterosexual) extramarital affair (and illegitimate child) is now small beer, not worthy of the print expenditure:

The reason no one is paying attention to the alleged affair and love-child is simple. You guys have made standard affairs boring (I know, I know. You claim to be a Democrat.). No one is claiming Edwards was seen in two wetsuits hanging from the ceiling with a dildo lodged in his rectum. There is no DC madam with a black book involved. No one has transcripts of him instant messaging teen-age congressional pages or crashing their dorms in a drunken stupor. There is no arrest record for soliciting oral sex in an airport bathroom, complete with feisty confrontations with the arresting officer on video tape. There is no religious hypocrisy and gay prostitution and meth-fueled sodomy binge to talk about.

In short, aside from the fact that all there is to the story is an Enquirer report, it is just boring. You all have made standard affairs pedestrian and dull. Even when you use the phrase “love child,” what it boils down to is a guy allegedly sleeping with a woman. Pretty tame stuff, given what the GOP has provided us for the past few years.

Now maybe if he got caught engaging in oral sex with goats. That would probably get some attention.

I think there’s something to be said about the innate homophobia contained within media coverage of the aforementioned events. But the hook that made them ‘newsworthy’ by mainstream press standards is the fact that, in most instances, the principals were all on record as being militantly homophobic Christian conservatives; their moral (and, in many cases, legal) transgressions were thus in direct opposition to their images and records as public officials.  Even former NY governor Elliot Spitzer was a grandstanding anti-prostitution crusader, so when he was caught in the middle of a prostitution ring, the immensity of the hypocrisy was too much for the jackals in the MSM to ignore (even as the puritanical response once again served as a revealing Rorschach Test of the collective American unconscious).

So, unless there’s more blood to this latest (alleged) ‘scandal’, one shouldn’t be surprised (nor shocked and outraged!!11one) at the underwhelmed non-response from the press.

Of course, as David Corn notes, even if this story never makes the 24 hour cable news cycle, the allegations have effectively removed Edwards from VP consideration:

[W]hether you read about this matter in the Times or not, the veep-vetters of the Obama campaign have probably paid the story notice. If Edwards is still in contention, he better have for them a rather convincing denial to allay suspicions that this time the scandalmongers of the Enquirer might have actually gotten it right.

Regardless, one wonders if the McCain campaign really wants the media to be talking about political figures running around behind the backs of their sick wives.


Recommend this post at Progressive Bloggers

8 thoughts on “On John Edwards ‘Love Child’

  1. I never know quite what to say about sex scandals, notably American political ones. I mean, on the one hand, I am mostly sex-positive, as long as it’s all consensual, and I hate the loading of the subject; I rilly do.

    I also don’t believe that all partners are going to be reacting in stereotypical ways to the news that the other partner got swept away. That’s between the partners in the partnership, and it’s nobody else’s business how they think of all that. I think it’s important that we don’t project sentimentalities on to other perfectly capable adults who may not share them.

    At the same time, I put a very high value on trust and honesty in partnerships, not to mention public life, so if someone has been living a lie, that is a serious problem to me.

    Beyond that, jealousy is one of my major character flaws, so if I felt I had been betrayed by someone I loved because he had lied to me, I would be out of my mind, clawing off my skin, and in need of the help of friends.

    But how teh hell can we know whether any of these things is true in this situation? I think that Larry Craig’s case is much more clear: he has been and remains a political campaigner for oppressive “values” that he seems to disregard in his own life. I don’t see anything like that in what we know of Edwards, but who knows, and do we have the right?

    One thing I know for sure: I would NEVER condescend to Elizabeth Edwards by feeling sorry for her. She is definitely not a pitiable person.


  2. I just want to know, when did the National Enquirer become a legitimate source for anything?

    Last week they did a story on Bigfoot’s love child with the Area 51 alien. Or was that Weekly World News?

    Wev. Same fiction.


  3. HOW does such an OLD woman of 44 even get
    pregnant so easily??

    Rielle Hunter is pre-menopausal if not menopausal
    in her MID 40s !


  4. Forgive me for putting it this way, but that is a silly comment. Google Cherie Blair.

    Most women can probably get pregnant into their late forties, maybe their early fifties; there is great individual variation. You don’t know you’ve hit menopause until you’ve hit menopause — srsly.


  5. the enquirer reported Larry Sinslair and hussein obama Drug and homosexual activity and no news outlets wanted to know about it. surely even obama has not denied this rumour and his running for president of Ameica !! stories of obama drug and homosexual activity is big news in australia and i guess will filter to the world at large. God Bless America and God Damn king hussein obama . Amen.


  6. hey skdadl ,

    That does not mean you really should have a baby in 40s or 50s, or it will have developmental delays/autism/retardation/Downs !
    How would you know?
    Many people hide their kids’ severe problems
    from the world, as John Travolta does and other celebs with Autism/MR !
    Gov Sarah Palin just had a Dons boy, she s 44.
    So did another congresswoman in her early 40s and they are DEVASTATED about not having a normal son.
    It is dangerous and tragic.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s