by matttbastard
MY HYPOTHESIS last week that another 9/11 attack would unite America was wrong, judging by e-mail and voice-mail responses. When I stopped reading at 1,000 (lots more unread) roughly 65 percent disagreed with me, many violently and obscenely.
[...]
I led my column saying, ‘I was thinking another 9/11 would help America.’ I was speculating on the effect of an attack, not calling for it. Later I said I had no doubt terrorists are planning to attack us again. ‘If it is to be, then let it be.’ I am resigned to an attack, not calling for it.
Ah, I see. We all know that another cataclysmic terror attack by freedom-hating ragheads is inevitable. Amercians should at least take advantage of the opportunity, put aside their petty differences (rule of law smule of law – LET’S ROLL!), make omelettes and lemonade and serve it at a huge bipartisan Nuremberg brunch! No French toast or hummus on the menu, I presume.
At least Stu has managed to unite a good number of Americans (and non*ahem*) in the conclusion that he’s a fucking dipshit.
Related: Via Avedon Carol, William K. Wolfrum has his own proposal for unity, infinitely more modest than Bykofsky’s.


















5 responses so far ↓
isabellacoeur // August 13, 2007 at 12:58 pm
Is “dipshit” the technical term, Mr. Bastard? ;P
matttbastard // August 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm
That’s fucking dipshit, Ms LaCoeur.
I heart unity.
William K. Wolfrum » Blog Archive » Contextual corrections // August 13, 2007 at 3:02 pm
[...] was taken out of context. What Bykofsky really meant to write [...]
zuzu // August 14, 2007 at 2:43 pm
You know what’s scary?
35% AGREED. Or at least didn’t disagree.
matttbastard // August 14, 2007 at 2:54 pm
How much you wanna bet the actual percentage of unqualified support was 26%?